نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
There are many cases where religious scholars, including Imami theologians, have opted for non-literal interpretation of religious texts. This practice occurs when scholars perceive a conflict between the literal meaning of a Quranic verse or hadith and one of their beliefs—whether rooted in revealed doctrines, judgments of theoretical or practical reason, or sensory and experimental knowledge—and then prioritize their beliefs over the literal meaning of the verse or hadith. This article analyzes and compares the interpretations in the works of al-Shaykh al-Ṣadūq, al-Shaykh al-Mufīd, and al-Sayyid al-Murtaḍā where sensory and experimental beliefs take precedence over the literal meaning of religious texts. The analysis and comparison aim to reveal the similarities and differences in interpretation among these theologians, providing a clearer picture of their theological approaches and the extent of their commitment to the literal meanings of religious texts.
کلیدواژهها English
